Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:27:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:27:24 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:1296 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:27:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:26:42 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: , , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository In-Reply-To: <20020222160657.A7914@caldera.de> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > the Linux 2.4 repository at linux.bkbbits.net is orphaned short after > it got created. Ist there any chance we could see continguous checkins > for it? > > I think it might be a good idea to get it automatically checked in once > Marcelo uploads a new (pre-) patch as part of the kernel.org > notification procedure (is this possible, Peter?). > > If there is no way to automate it I would volunteer to do the checkins, > but for that I'd need write permissions to the repository. I've got a script here which pretty much automates the checkins of incremental patches, it should be trivial for Peter to call that from his script that creates the incremental diffs. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/