Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:52:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:51:52 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:32019 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:51:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:38:43 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Alan Cox cc: "Pedro M. Rodrigues" , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Does forcing a command to bypass the contents in the cache meaning > > anything. This is not a cache sync like SCSI. It is a cache bypass and > > will violate the journal on the down/commit block. > > Thats a really useful option for a whole load of operations. Database folk > in paticular may well benefit as will O_DIRECT stuff > I agree that command mode has a proper use but the goal was to add in write ordering barrier operations w/ a setfeature to modify the behavior of the command. Cheers, Andre Hedrick Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/