Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757939AbZCSQR5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:17:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752489AbZCSQRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:17:46 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:32881 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752210AbZCSQRp (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:17:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:06:33 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alex Chiang , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trent Piepho Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Message-ID: <20090319160633.GA20816@kroah.com> References: <20090318222426.887.1008.stgit@bob.kio> <20090318224006.887.91805.stgit@bob.kio> <20090319024334.59e9e9bc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090319024334.59e9e9bc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2976 Lines: 92 On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:43:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:40:06 -0600 Alex Chiang wrote: > > > This patch adds an attribute named "remove" to a PCI device's sysfs > > directory. Writing a non-zero value to this attribute will remove the PCI > > device and any children of it. > > > > Trent Piepho wrote the original implementation and documentation. > > > > Thanks to Vegard Nossum for testing under kmemcheck and finding locking > > issues with the sysfs interface. > > > > ... > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c > > @@ -246,6 +246,47 @@ struct bus_attribute pci_bus_attrs[] = { > > __ATTR(rescan, S_IWUSR, NULL, bus_rescan_store), > > __ATTR_NULL > > }; > > + > > +static void remove_callback(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + int bridge = 0; > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > > + > > + mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); > > + > > + if (pdev->subordinate) > > + bridge = 1; > > + > > + pci_remove_bus_device(pdev); > > + if (bridge && list_empty(&pdev->bus->devices)) > > + pci_remove_bus(pdev->bus); > > + > > + mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t > > +remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *dummy, > > + const char *buf, size_t count) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + unsigned long val; > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > > + > > + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val) < 0) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > > + return -EPERM; > > + > > + if (pdev->subordinate && pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus)) > > + return -EBUSY; > > + > > + if (val) > > + ret = device_schedule_callback(dev, remove_callback); > > + if (ret) > > + count = ret; > > + return count; > > +} > > #endif > > It is very hard for the reader (this one at least) to work out why > device_schedule_callback() is used here, instead of simply doing the work > directly. > > The way to solve that problem is to add a code comment. > > Given that we're in a sysfs write() handler where no relevant locks at all > are held, it seems rather weird that we cannot perform this operation > synchronously, but no doubt the comment will explain all of this. > > Do we need the CAP_SYS_ADMIN check if the sysfs file permissions are > correct? (I keep on asking this then forgetting the answer). You can do this kind of check if you want to be paranoid. You can specify the mode of the file when you create it, but if a properly permissive user (like root) changes the mode, it sticks, so that a "normal" use could then write to the file. Usually I wouldn't recommend checking, as it's overkill if you set the mode properly in the code. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/