Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760927AbZCSUPc (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757572AbZCSUOW (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:14:22 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:35711 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757121AbZCSUOV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:14:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:14:04 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Sindhudweep Sarkar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Hellstrom , Richard Purdie Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes Message-ID: <20090319201404.GD17094@kroah.com> References: <20090319040809.GA29249@kroah.com> <6c046ab30903190903r298a0334n939e64403b8aeda6@mail.gmail.com> <20090319162719.GB32078@kroah.com> <6c046ab30903191111y408a6c9g4cb392ad0331c011@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6c046ab30903191111y408a6c9g4cb392ad0331c011@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1542 Lines: 33 On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:11:18PM -0400, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote: > Of course real support for poulsbo is really important and desirable > since netbooks make such a huge percentage of computer sales these > days. I'm guessing, however, that the number of > embedded/mobile/appliance devices that use or will use the SGX5xx is > much larger than even the plethora of netbooks being pumped out. If > more hardware support can be gained for a little extra burden why not > go for it? I would argue that a unified driver stack would actually > have less maintenance cost since common bugs could be killed. Even > ignoring all the arm devices that will use that graphics core, what > about intel's own use of the SGX 535 elsewhere? Does this "poulsbo" > driver support the intel CE3100 processors? > > > I think i'm really apprehensive about device specific one-offs. Of > course a mainline driver upstream is an important step to prevent that > but without a roadmap it only seems marginally better. Staging is all aobut "device specific one-offs". the code is then in a common area where everyone can work to fix it up properly. I don't want to burry this work again in random git trees that no one has any clue how to put together, like has already been done in the past. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/