Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758479AbZCSUkj (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754548AbZCSUk3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:29 -0400 Received: from ns2.gothnet.se ([82.193.160.251]:15689 "EHLO GOTHNET-SMTP2.gothnet.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753776AbZCSUk3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:29 -0400 Message-ID: <49C2ADA8.2090405@shipmail.org> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:40:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Dave Airlie , David Airlie , Thomas Hellstrom , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Purdie Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes References: <20090319040809.GA29249@kroah.com> <21d7e9970903182348v57a78188ocefe138d353ee197@mail.gmail.com> <49C21B0B.4060809@shipmail.org> <20090319201136.GB17094@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20090319201136.GB17094@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-BitDefender-Scanner: Mail not scanned due to license constraints Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1300 Lines: 39 Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote: > >>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries, >>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and >>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least! >>> >>> >> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm >> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of >> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM >> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging >> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful. >> >> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards >> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs >> to be stripped. >> > > Great, care to respin it and send it to me? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Greg, A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches. I'm not sure why it got lost along the way? /Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/