Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:57:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:57:41 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:10250 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:57:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3C76BEC1.5A13BCA1@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:57:21 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: endre@interware.hu CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Eepro100 driver. In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org endre@interware.hu wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Would be a lot nicer to see someone spending the time pulling the > > > useful bits out of e100 and putting it into eepro100. e100 is ugly and > > > bloated for no reason. > > > > When it passes my review, it will not be. > > e100 + my desired changes == eepro100 + my desired changes > > Will it be possible to use the vlan code in the kernel with e100? From > what I can see Intel has its own way of doing vlans and that seems > powerful but overcomplicated to me. If it's non-standard, it's not getting in the kernel. We have VLAN stuff already... -- Jeff Garzik | "UNIX enhancements aren't." Building 1024 | -- says /usr/games/fortune MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/