Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755438AbZCTCoO (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:44:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751927AbZCTCnz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:55 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:50851 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbZCTCny (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:42:49 -0700 From: Greg KH To: hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC Aufs2 #3 2/2] split 'xino' entry under sysfs Message-ID: <20090320024249.GA19989@kroah.com> References: <1237439565-25039-1-git-send-email-hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> <1237439565-25039-3-git-send-email-hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> <20090320004539.GF18781@kroah.com> <3934.1237515949@jrobl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3934.1237515949@jrobl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1751 Lines: 54 On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:25:49AM +0900, hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp wrote: > > Greg KH: > > > +Description: > > > + It shows the consumed blocks by xib (External Inode Number > > > + Bitmap), its block size and file size. > > > + When the aufs mount option 'noxino' is specified, it > > > + will be empty. About XINO files, see > > > + Documentation/filesystems/aufs/aufs.5 in detail. > > > > Sysfs files are one value per file. This violates that rule. > > Current print format is > "%llux%lu %lld\n", st->blocks, st->blksize, (long long)st->size > > Do you mean this has three values and violates the rule? Hm, rule is "one value per file", since this file has 3 values, what do you think? :) > And aufs should create three entries such like xib/blocks, xib/blksize > and xib/size? Yes. > If I change it "x", is it still violation? I don't understand. > > Are all of these things something that a "normal" user would care about? > > or are they development / debugging things? > > Normal users want to care them, I guess. Really? Try leaving them out for now and see if anyone notices :) > > And why are you using seq_file for a sysfs file? That's not allowed, > > and a sure sign you are doing something wrong, please remove all of > > that. > > I just wanted to set limit its size to PAGE_SIZE to print the absolute > path. Is there another better approach? Do you really need to print these paths? And are they going to bigger than PATH_MAX? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/