Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:58:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:58:48 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:58005 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:58:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:58:38 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Larry McVoy , Tom Rini , Rik van Riel , Christoph Hellwig , hpa@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository Message-ID: <20020222175838.G11156@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Davide Libenzi , Larry McVoy , Tom Rini , Rik van Riel , Christoph Hellwig , hpa@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20020222173222.E11156@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:46:54PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:46:54PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > Larry, i've a question for you. > Does BK use the same basic algos of diff+patch ? Absolutely not. > Or, if CVS fails a merge, what is the probability that BK will succeed on > the same op ? About 95% in our source base. You can actually run a script over the tree, and retry all the merges with the CVS alg and the BK alg. The BK alg automerges about 95% of the ones where CVS would not (could not). These results are typical, in fact, the percentages go up as the number of parallel developers go up. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/