Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:44:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:44:04 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:4020 "HELO outpost.powerdns.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:43:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:43:53 +0100 From: bert hubert To: "Paul G. Allen" Cc: "Linux kernel developer's mailing list" Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Message-ID: <20020223164353.B1952@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , "Paul G. Allen" , Linux kernel developer's mailing list In-Reply-To: <3C771D29.942A07C2@starband.net>, <3C771D29.942A07C2@starband.net> <20020223134053.4fbe25ed.gang_hu@soul.com.cn> <3C772EF4.DB49876F@zip.com.au> <3C775FEF.BDA0253C@randomlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C775FEF.BDA0253C@randomlogic.com>; from pgallen@randomlogic.com on Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:27:21AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:27:21AM +0000, Paul G. Allen wrote: > Which compiler, of all of the different versions, generates the most > stable and fastest code. Compile speed and kernel size is not NEARLY as > important as performance. So, which compiler fits the bill? GCC 3.1, is what I'm told. 3.x has the infrastructure to do more optimizing, but doesn't do all of it yet. 3.1 is supposed to. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control: http://ds9a.nl/lartc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/