Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756371AbZCVWnp (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:43:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755948AbZCVWnf (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:43:35 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:37362 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755818AbZCVWnf (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:43:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:44:33 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Eric Dumazet , dipankar@in.ibm.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer Message-ID: <20090322154433.1b2cb1b1@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090322205212.GI7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090321125115.0a76ac27@infradead.org> <49C54D60.80306@cosmosbay.com> <20090321210745.GE7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090321204045.4a9022fd@infradead.org> <20090322043838.GF7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090321215109.717a3f12@infradead.org> <20090322051822.GG7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090321225318.5b25f0a7@infradead.org> <20090322165324.GH7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090322124632.5d5d6266@infradead.org> <20090322205212.GI7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1304 Lines: 35 On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:52:12 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:53:24 -0700 > > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > > > > How many synchronize_rcu() calls are you seeing on the boot > > > > > path? > > > > > > > > I see 20 that hit the above code path (eg ones that wait) until > > > > userspace starts. > > > > > > So with well-behaved readers, the full sequence would be worth > > > something like 50-60 milliseconds. > > > > yeah it's about 10% if the total kernel boot time.. so it does > > start to matter > > Half-second boot, eh? That would indeed be impressive. half a second until calling init.. that's what I have today (with all drivers built in).. nothing really special needed for it (well a few small patches that are pending for 2.6.30 ;-) -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/