Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:31:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:31:14 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:34208 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:31:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:31:01 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: bert hubert , Alexander Viro , Dan Aloni , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] C exceptions in kernel Message-ID: <20020223103101.G11156@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , bert hubert , Alexander Viro , Dan Aloni , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20020223162100.A1952@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20020223192154.A3837@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020223192154.A3837@outpost.ds9a.nl>; from ahu@ds9a.nl on Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:21:54PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I mean, this is just pathetic. There is valid criticism to new ideas, but > this isn't it. There are places to learn how to do basic programming and this isn't it. There is no way that the kernel list can handle every bad idea over and over again in a kind and gentle way. Doing so requires so much time that noone would ever get any real work done. At some point, you just say no. If we didn't, we'd still be arguing about STREAMS, redoing the kernel in C++, etc. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/