Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756372AbZCWLRV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:17:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753102AbZCWLRK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:17:10 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:40260 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754156AbZCWLRI (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:17:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:14:59 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Roland McGrath cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Linux API Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND] In-Reply-To: <20090227000352.7D32BFC339@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: References: <20090226133339.875832967@linutronix.de> <20090227000352.7D32BFC339@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 25 Roland, On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > I don't see any rationale for rt_tgsigqueueinfo and rt_sigqueueinfo to > differ in their treatment of si_pid/si_uid (whatever that is). It just > seems like common sense that they would match. > > Oleg and/or Sukadev have some patches floating around (maybe all in -mm?) > that relate to setting those. You mean having the same logic as we have in {t,tg,}kill syscalls for rt_sigqueueinfo as well ? Is there anything else which stands in the way of getting the rt_tgsigqueueinfo interface merged ? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/