Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293187AbSBWTMu>; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:12:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293188AbSBWTMk>; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:12:40 -0500
Received: from pogo.esscom.com ([199.89.135.169]:11283 "EHLO esscom.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S293187AbSBWTMa>;
	Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:12:30 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:12:07 -0700 (MST)
From: Kurt Ferreira <kferreir@esscom.com>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] C exceptions in kernel
In-Reply-To: <20020223193812.A4168@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202231206400.2620-100000@pogo.esscom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, bert hubert wrote:

> Lots of people found the time to send derogative answers though - and how
> well known are these in extinguising discussion and allowing us more time to
> code! 
> 
> Typing in the few reasons why this, or any idea, is so well rejected hardly
> takes more time and *does* extinguish the thread rapidly.
>

I think you might not being understanding.  It has been discussed.  In
some cases over and over.  A search of the mailing list archives give the
reasons why these (and many like it) have been rejected.  The terse 'no'
is most likley fustration that the poster did not do his/her homework by
searching archives before posting.

Kurt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/