Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760901AbZCWV3S (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:29:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754694AbZCWV3H (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:29:07 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:48643 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754678AbZCWV3G (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:29:06 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,410,1233561600"; d="scan'208";a="500190317" Subject: Re: Error: freeing invalid memtype From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Kevin Winchester , Dave Airlie , LKML In-Reply-To: <20090323194828.GC29478@elte.hu> References: <49C03208.6050603@gmail.com> <1237399938.4529.208.camel@localhost.localdomain> <49C572CC.6090704@gmail.com> <20090323190720.GA16831@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20090323194828.GC29478@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:27:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1237843651.4529.587.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 (2.24.3-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2717 Lines: 74 On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:48 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:05:48PM -0700, Kevin Winchester wrote: > > > Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > > > Kevin, > > > > > > > > Can you please send me the output of > > > > # cat /debug/x86/pat_memtype_list > > > > > > > > (with debugfs mounted at /debug) as soon as you login into X and also > > > > when you start seeing these errors with etracer and glxinfo. > > > > > > > > > > Here is the output before attempting to run glxinfo: > > > : : > > > : : > > > > > > Does that help track down the problem? I am about to try disabling PAT > > > in my config to see if that fixes things. > > > > > > > Can you please try the patch below and let me whether it helps. > > > > Thanks, > > Venki > > > > x86, PAT: Change vma prot in pci_mmap to reflect inherited prot > > > > While looking at the issue in the thread > > http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=123606627824556&w=2 > > noticed a bug in pci PAT code and memory type setting. > > > > pci mmap code did not set the proper protection in vma, when it > > inherited protection in reserve_memtype. This bug only affects > > the case where there exists a WC mapping before X does an mmap > > with /proc or /sys pci interface. This will cause X userlevel > > mmap from /proc or /sysfs to fail on fork. > > > > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi > > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > index 5ead808..f234a37 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > @@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > flags = new_flags; > > + vma->vm_page_prot = __pgprot( > > + (pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK) | > > + flags); > > If it solves the problem it will be for -stable too, right? > > It could be done a bit cleaner i think: is the ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK > really needed? Does ->vm_page_prot ever have page frame bits set? > Yes. This is a candidate for stable. And yes. vm_page_prot should not have cacheability bits on, so ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK can be avoided here. I had that, just wanting to be careful with and avoid further silly bugs in this code. I will test version without ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK and resend it. Thanks, Venki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/