Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:00:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:00:24 -0500 Received: from xenial.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.203.16]:7949 "EHLO xenial.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:00:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:00:04 +0000 From: John Levon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops Message-ID: <20020223220004.GA49114@compsoc.man.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1014444810.1003.53.camel@phantasy> <3C773C02.93C7753E@zip.com.au> <1014449389.1003.149.camel@phantasy> <3C774AC8.5E0848A2@zip.com.au> <20020223043815.B29874@hq.fsmlabs.com> <1014488408.846.806.camel@phantasy> <20020223120648.A1295@hq.fsmlabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020223120648.A1295@hq.fsmlabs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Bendik Singers - Afrotid X-Toppers: N/A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:06:48PM -0700, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > With preemption this turns into a problem that is easier to solve > with a lock or by not having per-cpu caches in the first place -- whilst you're correct (pre-emption has made everything harder), there's not much point moaning about it, since it's in linus' kernel now. So why bother ? regards john -- "Oh dear, more knobs." - David Chase - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/