Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id <S130882AbQK3UGL>; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:06:11 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
        id <S131145AbQK3UGB>; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:06:01 -0500
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:15376 "EHLO
        vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id <S131148AbQK3TuT>; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:50:19 -0500
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:10:15 -0700
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
To: Christopher Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fasttrak100 questions...
Message-ID: <20001130131015.C12886@vger.timpanogas.org>
In-Reply-To: <8voa7g$d1r$1@forge.tanstaafl.de> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011291152500.5109-100000@sol.compendium-tech.com> <20001129210830.J17523@forge.tanstaafl.de> <20001129165236.A9536@vger.timpanogas.org> <3A266EE7.4C734350@nortelnetworks.com> <20001130114349.A12564@vger.timpanogas.org> <3A2697E1.B41C448@nortelnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <3A2697E1.B41C448@nortelnetworks.com>; from cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:09:37PM -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:09:37PM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:14:47AM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> 
> > > I think you should re-read the GPL.  You only have to provide source to
> > > people to whome you have distributed your new binaries, and you only
> > > have to provide that source if you are asked for it.  If you have some
> > > code that you have written that is based on GPL'd code, and you are the
> > > only person that ever runs the binaries, then there is no obligation for
> > > you to make your code available to anybody.
> > 
> > Depends on what terms the code is provided under.  Using GPL code in a
> > for profit enterprise and distributing it to customers does require
> > that the changes be provided upon request.  I have read the GPL, and
> > I've had a lot of lawyers around here read and analyze it too.
> > 
> > :-)
> 
> Well of course this is the case.  I specifically said that I am the only
> one that ever ran the binaries.  Once you start distributing it to other
> people, then they can request the source additions/modifications and you
> are obligated to provide it.
> 
> Theoretically you could use software based on GPL'd code all throughout
> a for-profit corporation and make boatloads of money using that
> software.  As long as you don't distribute it to customers outside the
> company, and as long as none of the employees using it ask for the
> source and distribute it outside the company, nobody outside that
> corporation has any right to the source even though it is being used for
> profit.

I'm not certain this is technically correct, but I think it would be worth
having some folks here investigate this secnario.

Jeff


> 
> -- 
> Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10  
> Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
> 3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
> Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/