Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758210AbZCYFWa@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758210AbZCYFWa (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:22:30 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755970AbZCYFUz
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:20:55 -0400
Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:39428 "EHLO
	g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755875AbZCYFUx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:20:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:20:48 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove
Message-ID: <20090325052048.GA1584@ldl.fc.hp.com>
References: <20090320204327.12275.43010.stgit@bob.kio> <20090320205636.12275.1825.stgit@bob.kio> <49C74FCC.7070308@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090324192905.GA25984@ldl.fc.hp.com> <49C9BBD7.4040705@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49C9BBD7.4040705@jp.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2447
Lines: 53

* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Alex Chiang wrote:
> > * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> >> I still have the following kernel error messages in testing with your
> >> latest set of patches (Jesse's linux-next). The test case is removing
> >> e1000e device or its parent bridge by "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/
> >> .../remove".
> >>
> >> [  537.379995] =============================================
> >> [  537.380124] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> >> [  537.380128] 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1
> >> [  537.380128] ---------------------------------------------
> >> [  537.380128] events/4/56 is trying to acquire lock:
> >> [  537.380128]  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257fc0>] flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> >> [  537.380128]
> >> [  537.380128] but task is already holding lock:
> >> [  537.380128]  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> >> [  537.380128]
> >> [  537.380128] other info that might help us debug this:
> >> [  537.380128] 3 locks held by events/4/56:
> >> [  537.380128]  #0:  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> >> [  537.380128]  #1:  (&ss->work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> >> [  537.380128]  #2:  (pci_remove_rescan_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff803c10d1>] remove_callback+0x21/0x40
> > 
> > I still cannot reproduce this lockdep issue, even using your
> > .config with an e1000e device on an x86_64 kernel. :(
> > 
> > I tried removing the endpoint, an intermediate bridge device, and
> > the parent bus. I don't know what I'm doing wrong...
> > 
> 
> I don't know either...
> The reproducibility is 100% on my environment. The steps are
> just boot the system and remove the device.
> 
> > Can you please try this patch though, and see if it fixes the
> > warning? It applies on top of my other sysfs patch that
> > introduces a mutex in sysfs_schedule_callback.
> 
> Anyway, I confirmed the kernel error messages were gone with
> the patch against sysfs. Note that I used the following patch
> I made for testing instead since your patch could not be
> applied to Jesse's linux-next. 

Great, thank you for testing Kenji-san.

/ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/