Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755374AbZCYFjY (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:39:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753439AbZCYFjM (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:39:12 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:50486 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752665AbZCYFjL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:39:11 -0400 Message-ID: <49C9C375.6060306@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:39:01 +0900 From: Kenji Kaneshige User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Chiang CC: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trent Piepho Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove References: <20090320204327.12275.43010.stgit@bob.kio> <20090320205636.12275.1825.stgit@bob.kio> <49C74FCC.7070308@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090324192905.GA25984@ldl.fc.hp.com> <49C9BBD7.4040705@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090325052048.GA1584@ldl.fc.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090325052048.GA1584@ldl.fc.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2690 Lines: 61 Alex Chiang wrote: > * Kenji Kaneshige : >> Alex Chiang wrote: >>> * Kenji Kaneshige : >>>> I still have the following kernel error messages in testing with your >>>> latest set of patches (Jesse's linux-next). The test case is removing >>>> e1000e device or its parent bridge by "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/ >>>> .../remove". >>>> >>>> [ 537.379995] ============================================= >>>> [ 537.380124] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] >>>> [ 537.380128] 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1 >>>> [ 537.380128] --------------------------------------------- >>>> [ 537.380128] events/4/56 is trying to acquire lock: >>>> [ 537.380128] (events){--..}, at: [] flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0 >>>> [ 537.380128] >>>> [ 537.380128] but task is already holding lock: >>>> [ 537.380128] (events){--..}, at: [] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230 >>>> [ 537.380128] >>>> [ 537.380128] other info that might help us debug this: >>>> [ 537.380128] 3 locks held by events/4/56: >>>> [ 537.380128] #0: (events){--..}, at: [] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230 >>>> [ 537.380128] #1: (&ss->work){--..}, at: [] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230 >>>> [ 537.380128] #2: (pci_remove_rescan_mutex){--..}, at: [] remove_callback+0x21/0x40 >>> I still cannot reproduce this lockdep issue, even using your >>> .config with an e1000e device on an x86_64 kernel. :( >>> >>> I tried removing the endpoint, an intermediate bridge device, and >>> the parent bus. I don't know what I'm doing wrong... >>> >> I don't know either... >> The reproducibility is 100% on my environment. The steps are >> just boot the system and remove the device. >> >>> Can you please try this patch though, and see if it fixes the >>> warning? It applies on top of my other sysfs patch that >>> introduces a mutex in sysfs_schedule_callback. >> Anyway, I confirmed the kernel error messages were gone with >> the patch against sysfs. Note that I used the following patch >> I made for testing instead since your patch could not be >> applied to Jesse's linux-next. > > Great, thank you for testing Kenji-san. > You're welcome. Just in case, my patch is just for testing, and it is very buggy (no destroy operation, lack of module_put() in error code path, and so on). Please consider it as just for testing. Thanks, Kenji Kaneshige -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/