Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760949AbZCYMky (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758477AbZCYMko (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:44 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41104 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758104AbZCYMkn (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:40:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:39:20 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Paul Mundt , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, starvik@axis.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net, cooloney@kernel.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [GIT RFC] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default percpu allocator Message-ID: <20090325123920.GB30755@elte.hu> References: <1236671631-9305-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20090316190132.7965a49a@skybase> <49C300D8.5080204@kernel.org> <49C8FAC4.6060508@kernel.org> <20090325122738.42d105b7@skybase> <49CA1AC3.9080908@kernel.org> <20090325122241.GE11571@elte.hu> <49CA2345.70204@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CA2345.70204@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 23 * Tejun Heo wrote: > > Btw., is there any intermediate fix/workaround i could apply > > perhaps? I'd like to send the percpu bits early in the merge > > window and would hate to break Martin's arch ... > > Martin's original patch should do the trick although it would be > slower for static symbols. I'll merge it and post the tree. thanks! > BTW, I couldn't do the sparc32 test as the sparc I got is IIe > which can't boot 32 bit kernels. :-( a pity ... Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/