Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:43:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:43:12 -0500 Received: from mail.pha.ha-vel.cz ([195.39.72.3]:55044 "HELO mail.pha.ha-vel.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:42:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:42:46 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Rik van Riel Cc: nick@snowman.net, Alan Cox , Martin Dalecki , Troy Benjegerdes , Linus Torvalds , Andre Hedrick , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111 Message-ID: <20020224224246.C1949@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:32:09PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:32:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 nick@snowman.net wrote: > > > None of the chipsets that supported VLB had more than one buss. What > > I don't know is some idiot may have built a VLB-VLB bridge, but I > > doubt it. > > There are PCI-VLB bridges. Though it's unlikely, it may be > possible that there are systems with multiple such bridges > around... ;) Uhh? I thought most the PCI & VLB systems had the PCI hanging off the VLB and not the other way around. At least those I've seen had it this way. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/