Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:48:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:48:10 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:4367 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:47:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 18:47:34 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Alan Cox , Martin Dalecki , Troy Benjegerdes , Linus Torvalds , Andre Hedrick , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111 In-Reply-To: <20020224224135.B1949@ucw.cz> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > I think having two VLBs is quite impossible - they were wired right to > the CPU. Maybe in some early weird multiprocessor 486 or p5 machine? I've had a 486 box with a PCI bus and a VLB bus behind a PCI-VLB bridge. Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/