Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756416AbZCZOMo (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:12:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754372AbZCZOMg (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:12:36 -0400 Received: from mba.ocn.ne.jp ([122.1.235.107]:52011 "EHLO smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754109AbZCZOMf (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:12:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090326.231243.112855442.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: <20090321.212920.25912728.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20090318.110154.76582864.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20090321.212920.25912728.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1667 Lines: 36 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:29:20 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > I think creating a dma_device instance per channel and specifying that > > device like atmel-mci is the more future-proof way to go. > > Well, I have considered it but it looks overkill for me at that time. > Maybe time to think again... > > > > And I want to call Channel-3 of DMAC-0 "dma0chan3" even if Channel-2 > > > was assigned to for public memcpy channel. > > > > The problem is you could pass in the chan_id to guarantee 'chan3', but > > there is no guarantee that you will get 'dma0', as the driver has no > > knowledge of what other dma devices may be in the system. > > Yes, I do not expect 'dma0'. My filter function uses > dev_name(chan->device->dev), which is "txx9dmac.0" in this case. > > Anyway, "one dma-device per channel" manner will make things much simpler. Unfortunately, not so simple. If I created a dma_device for each channel, all chan->chan_id will be 0 and all chan->device->dev points same platform device. This makes client driver hard to select the particular channel. Making a platform device for each channel will solve this, but it looks wrong way to go for me. So I will go back to multiple channels per device style, and try to simplify "reservation". While all client should know correct channel number, the reservation is just for detecting bad configuration. --- Atsushi Nemoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/