Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759978AbZCZRx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:53:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757964AbZCZRxU (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:53:20 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:52379 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756284AbZCZRxU (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:53:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:51:37 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] new memory_accessor interface and usage Message-Id: <20090326105137.5bf765e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <874oxgi4hp.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1237239379-24186-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <200903161610.06469.david-b@pacbell.net> <874oxgi4hp.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 36 On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:22:10 -0700 Kevin Hilman wrote: > David Brownell writes: > > > On Monday 16 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> This series adds an interface by which other kernel code can read/write > >> persistent memory such as I2C or SPI EEPROMs, or devices which provide > >> NVRAM. __Use cases include storage of board-specific configuration data > >> like Ethernet addresses and sensor calibrations, etc. > > > > Looks OK to me. Once this goes in (with support for I2C and SPI EEPROMs) > > then various RTC's NVRAM support can be updated too ... at a quick count, > > that makes nine more drivers that can easily support this. > > > > I kind of like letting Linux have the option of using this kind of > > persistent storage, instead of keeping it so that only bootloaders > > (and maybe some userspace code) ever touch it. > > Andrew, > > What's the next step for this series? It's one of those areas that > doesn't seem to have clear ownership so this seems to be falling > through the cracks. I've been mostly-awol for a couple of weeks, sorry. It's presently stuck in my backlog queue along with everything else. I'll start chewing on that queue next week. As the patch "is pretty much a blocking issue for merging more complete DaVinci platform support" I guess we'll be wanting it in 2.6.30, yes? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/