To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] new memory_accessor interface and usage
References: <1237239379-24186-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
	<200903161610.06469.david-b@pacbell.net>
	<874oxgi4hp.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
	<20090326105137.5bf765e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Organization: Deep Root Systems, LLC
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:54:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20090326105137.5bf765e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu\, 26 Mar 2009 10\:51\:37 -0700")
Message-ID: <87zlf8f9u8.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1757
Lines: 41

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:22:10 -0700 Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>
>> David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> writes:
>> 
>> > On Monday 16 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> This series adds an interface by which other kernel code can read/write
>> >> persistent memory such as I2C or SPI EEPROMs, or devices which provide
>> >> NVRAM. __Use cases include storage of board-specific configuration data
>> >> like Ethernet addresses and sensor calibrations, etc.
>> >
>> > Looks OK to me.  Once this goes in (with support for I2C and SPI EEPROMs)
>> > then various RTC's NVRAM support can be updated too ... at a quick count,
>> > that makes nine more drivers that can easily support this.
>> >
>> > I kind of like letting Linux have the option of using this kind of
>> > persistent storage, instead of keeping it so that only bootloaders
>> > (and maybe some userspace code) ever touch it.
>> 
>> Andrew,
>> 
>> What's the next step for this series?  It's one of those areas that
>> doesn't seem to have clear ownership so this seems to be falling
>> through the cracks.
>
> I've been mostly-awol for a couple of weeks, sorry.  It's presently
> stuck in my backlog queue along with everything else.  I'll start
> chewing on that queue next week.
>
> As the patch "is pretty much a blocking issue for merging more complete
> DaVinci platform support" I guess we'll be wanting it in 2.6.30, yes?

Yes, I'm strongly hoping for 2.6.30.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/