Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:25:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:25:22 -0500 Received: from [209.250.53.24] ([209.250.53.24]:13576 "EHLO hapablap.dyn.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:25:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:27:27 -0600 From: Steven Walter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ext3 and undeletion Message-ID: <20020224212727.A15097@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> Mail-Followup-To: Steven Walter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Uptime: 9:23pm up 7:20, 0 users, load average: 1.01, 1.05, 1.08 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After unintentionally deleting some file, I noticed what appears to be an incosistency (or at least a change) in ext3. Running debugfs and executing the command "lsdel", I saw no inodes listed since I last ran the partition as ext2. Does ext3 not add its deleted inodes to whatever list ext2 does? And can this be fixed without compromising the speed or data-integrity of ext3? -- -Steven In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell He's alive. He's alive! Oh, that fellow at RadioShack said I was mad! Well, who's mad now? -- Montgomery C. Burns - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/