Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 03:50:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 03:50:32 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:4874 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 03:50:22 -0500 Message-ID: <3C79FA85.7010208@evision-ventures.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:49:09 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Hedrick CC: Paul Mackerras , Vojtech Pavlik , Troy Benjegerdes , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > As a point of reference for removal of the pci read/write space to the > host, I strongly suggest that be left alone. As for the removal of the > settings file, may of the distributions use this as a means to issue > script calls to enable and disable features w/o the use of an additional > application like "hdparm". You are sure the distros write to the PCI config space of the host chip device or the IO registers at boot time????!!! In esp. since the abolition in case did only just get introduced at 2.4.xx times??? Just show me one please! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/