Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762316AbZC0B2a (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757008AbZC0B2T (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:19 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34687 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756603AbZC0B2S (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:25:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Theodore Tso , David Rees , Jesper Krogh , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29 Message-Id: <20090326182519.d576d703.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <49C87B87.4020108@krogh.cc> <72dbd3150903232346g5af126d7sb5ad4949a7b5041f@mail.gmail.com> <49C88C80.5010803@krogh.cc> <72dbd3150903241200v38720ca0x392c381f295bdea@mail.gmail.com> <20090325183011.GN32307@mit.edu> <20090325220530.GR32307@mit.edu> <20090326171148.9bf8f1ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090326174704.cd36bf7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2000 Lines: 49 On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > userspace can get closer than the kernel can. > > Andrew, that's SIMPLY NOT TRUE. > > You state that without any amount of data to back it up, as if it was some > kind of truism. It's not. I've seen you repeatedly fiddle the in-kernel defaults based on in-field experience. That could just as easily have been done in initscripts by distros, and much more effectively because it doesn't need a new kernel. That's data. The fact that this hasn't even been _attempted_ (afaik) is deplorable. Why does everyone just sit around waiting for the kernel to put a new value into two magic numbers which userspace scripts could have set? My /etc/rc.local has been tweaking dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio and swappiness for many years. I guess I'm just incredibly advanced. > Everybody accepts that if you've written a 20MB file and then call > "fsync()" on it, it's going to take a while. But when you've written a 2kB > file, and "fsync()" takes 20 seconds, because somebody else is just > writing normally, _that_ is a bug. And it is actually almost totally > unrelated to the whole 'dirty_limit' thing. > > At least it _should_ be. That's different. It's inherent JBD/ext3-ordered brain damage. Unfixable without turning the fs into something which just isn't jbd/ext3 any more. data=writeback is a workaround, with the obvious integrity issues. The JBD journal is a massive designed-in contention point. It's why for several years I've been telling anyone who will listen that we need a new fs. Hopefully our response to all these problems will soon be "did you try btrfs?". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/