Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:16 -0500 Received: from mail.informatik.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.68.63]:11737 "EHLO mail.informatik.uni-ulm.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3C7A0977.8060100@student.uni-ulm.de> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:52:55 +0100 From: Markus Schaber Organization: Informatik Uni-Ulm User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: German, de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <3C771D29.942A07C2@starband.net> <20020222204456.O11156@work.bitmover.com> <3C77270A.1CBA02E8@zip.com.au> <20020225080742.GA3122@netnation.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Simon Kirby wrote: > I remember Borland Turbo Pascal's compiler... Yes, yes, but that thing > compiled insane amounts of code in split seconds on 386 hardware. But don't forget: Pascal was designed to ease the work of compiler writers - at least ANSI Pascal is easy to compile using a single-pass recursive descent compiler. And there wasn't so much optimization. markus -- Markus Schaber - http://www.schabi.de/ Check in to another world - test a _real_ OS. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/