Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761282AbZC0VEV (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753182AbZC0VEL (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:11 -0400 Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:46083 "EHLO rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914AbZC0VEJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Ext3 latency improvement patches From: Chris Mason To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Ric Wheeler , Linux Kernel Developers List , Ext4 Developers List , jack@suse.cz In-Reply-To: <1238187031.27455.212.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> References: <1238185471-31152-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1238187031.27455.212.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:03:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1238187818.27455.217.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt706.oracle.com [141.146.40.84] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020B.49CD3F2E.02A6:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 37 On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:24 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > The following patches have been posted as providing at least some > > partial improvement to the ext3 latency problem that has been > > discussed on the 2.6.29 mongo-LKML-thread-that-would-not-die. > > Ric had asked me about a test program that would show the worst case > ext3 behavior. So I've modified your ext3 program a little. It now > creates a 8G file and forks off another proc to do random IO to that > file. > > Then it runs one fsync every 4 seconds and times how long they take. > After the program has been running for 60 seconds, it tries to stop. > > On my sata drive with barriers on, even btrfs and xfs saw some > multi-second fsyncs, but ext3 came in at 414s for a single fsync. > > Warning: don't run this on a laptop drive, you'll still be waiting for > it next year. This is probably full of little errors, I cut it together > pretty quickly. > My understanding of ext4 delalloc is that once blocks are allocated to file, we go back to data=ordered. Ext4 is going pretty slowly for this fsync test (slower than ext3), it looks like we're going for a very long time in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction -> write_cache_pages. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/