Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:18:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:18:37 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:38416 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:18:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores... To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:31:26 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), rusty@rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell), mingo@elte.hu, matthew@hairy.beasts.org (Matthew Kirkwood), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), david@mysql.com (David Axmark), wli@holomorphy.com (William Lee Irwin III), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Feb 25, 2002 09:06:15 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > unlink() > > Sure, but that, together with making up a unique temporary name etc just > adds extra overhead for no actual gain. As opposed to adding special cases to the kernel which are unswappable and stand to tangle up bits of the generic vfs - eg we would have a vma with a vm_file but that file would not be in the dcache ? Is it really worth it. For temporary files unix has never adopted a tmpfile() syscall because nobody has ever found mkstemp() a paticularly critical path that justified it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/