Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757606AbZC2Ojg (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:39:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754404AbZC2Oj1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:39:27 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:38255 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753016AbZC2Oj0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:39:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Hugh Dickins , x86 maintainers , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <1238251730.2526.2.camel@ht.satnam> <20090328234012.GC4957@elte.hu> <1238308734.3074.3.camel@ht.satnam> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:08:50 +0530 Message-Id: <1238337530.2534.3.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1456 Lines: 38 On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 13:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 00:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > > > > > Please find a better use for your time. > > > > > > > > Imagine, there might be developers out there with real work > > > > to do in these files: all you are doing is throwing silly > > > > little obstacles in their way. > > > > > > Actually, now is the right time to do such changes as we've just > > > pushed all pending x86 changes upstream. And since these changes > > > reduce the chance of future patch conflicts, they do help > > > development. (in a small way) > > > > > > Nevertheless i'd suggest to make this a single commit, to not > > > clobber the shortlog with it. > > > > > > > I think individual patches will be better option, in case of unavoidable > > situation we can simply revert that particular patch. > > What unavoidable situation ? That you broke stuff with your changes ? > If you are so unsure about the quality of your changes, then the best > option is to not pull that stuff at all. > OK. Tree deleted, thanks for your advice. -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/