Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:36:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:36:20 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:25604 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:36:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:35:15 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Gerd Knorr , Hugh Dickins , Marcelo Tosatti , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , "David S. Miller" , Dave Jones , Subject: Re: [PATCH] __free_pages_ok oops In-Reply-To: <20020225133226.B11675@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > I disagree: requiring aio to execute completion in user context means > that we can no longer have quick completion directly from an interrupt > handler to a busy server executing in userland. Note that teh IO _completion_ can happen in user land. That does not mean that the IO page tear-down can (or should) happen at the same time. There are two issues here: - the data structures supporting the IO, built up and torn down from process space. - the IO itself. One is synchronous, the other is not. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/