Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754989AbZC3OWh (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:22:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752227AbZC3OW2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:22:28 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:46382 "EHLO mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751506AbZC3OW1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:22:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090329144531.GA1408@ucw.cz> References: <20090329144531.GA1408@ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:22:24 +0200 Message-ID: <897274600903300722m1f07d3f0yaf21e6e6fae05dae@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29 From: "Morten P.D. Stevens" To: Pavel Machek Cc: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, Linus Torvalds , Matthew Garrett , Alan Cox , Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , David Rees , Jesper Krogh , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 555 Lines: 20 2009/3/29 Pavel Machek : > Actually ext2 is more reliable in ext3 -- ext2 more reliable than ext3? Is this a joke? ext2 is about 15 years and the worst linux file system ever. It?s slow, no journaling... ext3 is fast, rockstable and solid. I think ext4 is more reliable than ext3. - Morten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/