Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:40:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:40:47 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:27144 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:40:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:31:46 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: DevilKin Cc: lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: <20020225200618.0FAE82069E@eos.telenet-ops.be> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, DevilKin wrote: > On Monday 25 February 2002 20:18, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Holzrichter, Bruce wrote: > > > > Ok, DAMN. I missed the -rc4 patch in 2.4.18. Real sorry about that. > > > > > > > > 2.4.19-pre1 will contain it. > > > > > > Should 2.4.18 final get a -dontuse tag or something? > > > > No. A "-dontuse" tag should be only used when the kernel can cause damage > > in some way. > > > > The patch which I missed only breaks static apps on _some_ architectures > > (not including x86). > > > > > Some people may get confused grabbing 2.4.18 and not getting the fixes > > > that went into rc-4? Just a thought... > > > > I already changed ftp.kernel.org's changelog adding: > > > > "Update: The SET_PERSONALITY fix in rc4 has _not_ > > been included in the final 2.4.18 by mistake." > > > > I guess thats enough. > > Wouldn't it be easier just to make a new 2.4.18 with the patch applied? > > Just to make all our lives a bit easier... Having two 2.4.18's is a bit of a mess for the ftp.kernel.org mirroring system. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/