Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756210AbZC3PhY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:37:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751977AbZC3PhJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:37:09 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:39996 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751850AbZC3PhH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:37:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:06:56 +0530 From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker , systemtap-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 3/4 V3] tracing: kprobe-tracer plugin supports arguments Message-ID: <20090330153656.GF6411@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: ananth@in.ibm.com References: <49CC08D2.30608@redhat.com> <20090330045813.GB6411@in.ibm.com> <49D0E600.7050204@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D0E600.7050204@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1340 Lines: 31 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 06:59:30PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > >> +/* TODO: Move these functions to arch/XXX/include/asm/debugger.h */ > >> + > > > > Maybe arch/xxx/lib/<>.c too? > > > > I know its on your list of TODOs but I'd prefer to have an > > arch_fetch_func_args() or somesuch in arch specific code, to start with. > > It is trivial to implement the argument extraction code on certain > > architectures and such a helper would be great. > > Hmm, I think fetch_* functions are more general framework, but > it's true that some of their implementation depend on architecture. > Thus, I'd prefer to separate some of basic implementaions(get_stack_nth, > get_argument_nth) from fetch_* and move it to arch/xxx/include/asm/ptrace.h, > because there are similar inline functions. > What would you think about this? I don't really have an opinion on the nomenclature as long as there is a clear arch specific callout that doesn't need to touch arch agnostic files. Ananth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/