Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761924AbZCaCpo (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:45:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759971AbZCaCpZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:45:25 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:52863 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759833AbZCaCpY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:45:24 -0400 Message-ID: <49D183BA.5020007@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:45:14 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Seto User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86, mce: Add mce_threshold option for intel cmci References: <49CB3F24.8040804@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090328120825.GB14464@elte.hu> <49D093F4.2080202@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <49D093F4.2080202@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 36 Andi Kleen wrote: > To turn it off you would need to disable the CMCI enable bit > completely. mce_threshold=0 discourages CMCI initialization. The CMCI enable bits are kept in off states in this case. > I have no problems in principle with a mce=nocmci that does that > but that would be a different patch. Now I have no strong reason to have threshold >1, so that's OK. > However I expect that this will be not a good idea to ever use on Nehalem > class systems at least because without CMCI the machine check code cannot > handle shared banks correctly and you'll get duplicated events from them. > And on non Nehalem systems there is no CMCI anyways, so it'll be always > off. One question is that even if one clears record in a shared bank, others sharing the bank still can retrieve same record? Or the duplication of recored only happens if a shared bank is polled by multiple cpu in parallel at same time? So old kernel without CMCI support running on new Nehalem class system will make duplicated records, right? Doesn't it impact to current distro like RHEL5? Thanks, H.Seto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/