Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:28:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:26:56 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:59404 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:26:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:28:27 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Thomas.Duffy.99@alumni.brown.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 Message-ID: <20020225232827.C2406@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: <20020225.140851.31656207.davem@redhat.com> <1014675271.12310.36.camel@tduffy-lnx.afara.com> <20020225.141650.36651183.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020225.141650.36651183.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002-02-25T14:16:50, "David S. Miller" said: > I think the benefits of not screwing up the real release > are larger than this inconvenience. Well, I would suggest to have a second look at the final releases to check for these minor issues; a second pair of eyes couldn't hurt. > As a side note I also think it's silly that we can't just "fix up" > when a slight error is made like this. In the worst possible case one > could make a real quick "2.4.18a" release that had things fixed. Yes. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/