Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:35:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:34:58 -0500 Received: from [217.79.102.244] ([217.79.102.244]:38901 "EHLO monkey.beezly.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:34:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK From: Beezly To: Alan Cox Cc: Chris Funderburg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-37Oon11ktFLChOHxBPJs" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 25 Feb 2002 22:34:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1014676477.23983.30.camel@monkey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-37Oon11ktFLChOHxBPJs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > FYI - The full tarball already has the missing patch... > > So, I think, it's only patch-2.4.18 that has the problem... >=20 > Argh thats the worst possible case. That means you can't do a single corr= ect > 2.4.18- patch=20 >=20 > If so Marcelo can you put up 2.4.18-fixed patch and a borked-fixed diff ? If this is the case... which "version" of 2.4.18 does 2.4.19-pre1 patch from? I'm guessing it patches you from the "patched-from-2.4.17" release of 2.4.18? (if that makes sense) Beezly --=-37Oon11ktFLChOHxBPJs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8erv9Xu4ZFsMQjPgRAkXUAKCZSwdd2gX36+JlXuHGTzCr3O48lACgiKw2 3qpeKiz6G5Qhkm8+5ER0JQU= =MG03 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-37Oon11ktFLChOHxBPJs-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/