Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:35:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:35:38 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:27141 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:35:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), chris@directcommunications.net (Chris Funderburg), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Feb 25, 2002 07:32:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > If so Marcelo can you put up 2.4.18-fixed patch and a borked-fixed diff ? > > That would break hpa's incremental diff patches. > If somebody needs 2.4.18 + fix, they can just run 2.4.18-rc4. That isnt the problem. Is 2.4.19-pre1 a patch versus the 2.4.18 tarball or the 2.4.18 patch ? Continue ad infinitum through every 2.4 release, add hundreds of confused emails about them to the kernel list and it ceases to look a smart idea to leave the two not matching Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/