Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756658AbZCaJKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:10:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754699AbZCaJKc (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:10:32 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:13295 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374AbZCaJKb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:10:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=kU1TLO84m6IYQQi59vGBFajLgI822waoFxd2HfvhkYuOIAw/BzLvKUFZsOnjLQgQsk ALfDhO9Gjk75Jh0JWb/mfSYGFmfkJD2+uSmT57aA/EMgadl+3j9keW0xikTuyPvStRZi EtBtyzxL9wJEETGXM9K7VXzhXxCCjH/F0/D+s= Message-ID: <49D1DE00.9030600@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:10:24 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boaz Harrosh CC: petkovbb@gmail.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups References: <1237910776-10983-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <200903281451.01361.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090328140405.GA2741@liondog.tnic> <49D08CEC.3010705@kernel.org> <49D0A985.7090307@panasas.com> <49D0FF56.3080205@kernel.org> <49D1D7A3.40303@panasas.com> <49D1DCE2.1050201@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <49D1DCE2.1050201@kernel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 759 Lines: 22 I really should proof read before hitting the send button. My head is somehow pretty good at messing up sentences. Tejun Heo wrote: > The reason why I want with sgl is because it's the sg mapping went it has ... > wouldn't be that large anyway. Both aren't worth worrying about > considering how relative coldness of the path and other overhead of Eh.. that was a nice mix of "how the path is relatively cold" and "relative coldness of the path". :-) Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/