From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:33:15 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.29-rjw; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; )
Cc: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@urpla.net>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
       Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903231617550.3032@localhost.localdomain> <200903310000.11522.hpj@urpla.net> <49D142AC.8090701@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <49D142AC.8090701@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903311533.16684.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 848
Lines: 21

On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 27. M?rz 2009 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > 
> > I always wonder, why Arjan does not intervene for his kerneloops.org 
> > project, since your approach opens a window of uncertainty during the merge 
> > window when simply using git as an efficient fetch tool.
> 
> I would *love* it if Linus would, as first commit mark his tree as "-git0"
> (as per snapshots) or "-rc0". So that I can split the "final" versus
> "merge window" oopses.

FWIW, that would also be useful for tracking regressions.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/