Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:22:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:21:59 -0500 Received: from flaxian.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([137.226.181.79]:41231 "EHLO moria.gondor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:21:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:21:49 +0100 From: Jan Niehusmann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 Message-ID: <20020225232149.GA13480@gondor.com> In-Reply-To: <20020225.140851.31656207.davem@redhat.com> <3C7AB893.4090800@ellinger.de> <20020225230156.GA11786@merlin.emma.line.org> <20020225.150813.66161624.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020225.150813.66161624.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:08:13PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > I repeat: it isn't a "release candidate" if it will not match preciely > what the final tarball/patches contains. Anything else opens up the > possibility for errors to be made. If the release candidates had identical version numbers, Marcelo could still copy rc3 to final instead of rc4. So this doesn't solve anything, it only adds some potential for confusion. Release candidates only help if people use them and report errors. And people who run rc kernels want to be able to use uname to find out which kernel version is running. So please keep EXTRAVERSION. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/