Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763378AbZDAQ7m (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:59:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755593AbZDAQ71 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:59:27 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:37279 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753941AbZDAQ70 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:59:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:01:03 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Gregory Haskins Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, pmullaney@novell.com, pmorreale@novell.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus Message-ID: <20090401170103.GU11935@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20090331184057.28333.77287.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <87ab71monw.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <49D35825.3050001@novell.com> <20090401132340.GT11935@one.firstfloor.org> <49D37805.1060301@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D37805.1060301@novell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1451 Lines: 40 On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:19:49AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> > > > > But surely you must have some specific use case in mind? Something > > that it does better than the various methods that are available > > today. Or rather there must be some problem you're trying > > to solve. I'm just not sure what that problem exactly is. > > > Performance. We are trying to create a high performance IO infrastructure. Ok. So the goal is to bypass user space qemu completely for better performance. Can you please put this into the initial patch description? > So the administrator can then set these attributes as > desired to manipulate the configuration of the instance of the device, > on a per device basis. How would the guest learn of any changes in there? I think the interesting part would be how e.g. a vnet device would be connected to the outside interfaces. > So the admin would instantiate this "vdisk" device and do: > > 'echo /path/to/my/exported/disk.dat > /sys/vbus/devices/foo/src_path' So it would act like a loop device? Would you reuse the loop device or write something new? How about VFS mount name spaces? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/