Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:06:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:06:46 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-132.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.132]:64389 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:06:29 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores... Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 05:57:39 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Rusty Russell , , Matthew Kirkwood , Benjamin LaHaise , David Axmark , William Lee Irwin III , , Larry McVoy In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 25, 2002 08:31 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Ok I see where you are coming from now -- that makes sense for a few > > cases. > > Note that the "few cases" in question imply _all_ of the current broken > library spinlocks, for example. > > Don't think "POSIX semaphores", but think "fast locking" in the general > case. I will bet you $1 in small change that most normal locking by far is > for the kind of thread-safe stuff libc does right now. This looks like another piece of the equation needed to make Larry's smp cluster concept come true. So... -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/