Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:52:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:52:14 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-132.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.132]:28550 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:52:02 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "Martin J. Bligh" , Shawn Starr , Linux Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in =?iso-8859-1?q?the tree?= Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 06:44:36 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <200202260135.18913.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <1014686150.18834.2.camel@coredump> <4360000.1014687125@flay> In-Reply-To: <4360000.1014687125@flay> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 26, 2002 02:32 am, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Not to begin the flamewar, but no thanks. rmap-12f blows -aa away AFAIK > > on this P200 w/ 64MB ram. > > rmap still sucks on large systems though. But this is not a fundamental issue, it's implementation. Whereas non-rmap will always suck on large systems, for fundamental reasons that are unrelated to the quality of the implementation. > I'd love to see rmap > in the main kernel, but it needs to get the scalability fixed first. Yes. > The main problem seems to be pagemap_lru_lock ... Rik & crew > know about this problem, but let's give them some time to fix it > before rmap gets put into mainline .... Yes, yes and yes. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/