Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:06:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:06:14 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:38161 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:05:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Matthias Andree cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: <20020225233230.GB11786@merlin.emma.line.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Matthias Andree wrote: > I'd think that running a script to "upgrade" 2.4.N-rcM to 2.4.N by just > unpacking that latest rc tarball, editing the Makefile and tarring > things up again, should be safe enough, and if it doesn't allow for > operator interference, especially so. Seems to me: - clean EXTRAVERSION - make new diff - make tar (one please) - make tar.gz from tar - compress tar to tar.bz2 -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/