Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:21:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:20:56 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:47626 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:20:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:20:21 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ken Brownfield , Dieter =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree Message-ID: <20020226072021.GC11837@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200202260135.18913.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20020225190241.C26077@asooo.flowerfire.com> <3C7AE123.97A92EA0@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C7AE123.97A92EA0@zip.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ken Brownfield wrote: > > > > ... > > It should be in it's own release separate from other major changes at > > least, IMHO, if the backport is desired by enough folk to outweigh the > > largish change. And I definitely have VM _way_ higher up my personal > > list. :) > > > > I intend to chunk up the -aa VM patch and feed it into 2.4.19-pre. > I think Andrea's OK with that. Just the VM and buffercache bits. > Something also needs to be done about block-highmem and pte-highmem. I've recommended block-highmem before, and I can do it again. If it needs to be split a bit (I don't really think it does, though), I can even do that too. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/