Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:29:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:29:14 -0500 Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]:25502 "EHLO mailout06.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:29:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3C7B64B7.9C834B84@t-online.de> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:34:31 +0100 From: Hans.Adams-Darmstadt@t-online.de (Hans Adams) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Monolithic Vs. Microkernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, at least two teams work upon it here in Germany references: http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/index.xml.de http://i30www.ira.uka.de A branch of stable kernels upon L4/Fiasco is maintained at TU Dresden and available at: http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/L4/LinuxOnL4/. Though Mr. Torvalds seems not to be amused about micro kernel aproach, this work is not done in vein due to the inherent technical superiority in certain applications mostly regarding distributed systems including NUMA architectures. best, Hans Adams - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/