Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756845AbZDBVHT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:07:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751588AbZDBVHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:07:04 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:58558 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751504AbZDBVHB (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:07:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:04:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Chris Wright , Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Travis , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , KOSAKI Motohiro , Venkatesh Pallipadi , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: 2.6.29 git, resume from ram broken on thinkpad Message-ID: <20090402210451.GA4076@elte.hu> References: <200904011155.20751.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> <200904020023.58363.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090401230637.GW18394@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <200904022300.01707.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904022300.01707.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1156 Lines: 27 * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2009, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote: > > > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought the breakage might be introduced > > > between 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 and > > > 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, so I thought it would be a good > > > idea to verify if 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f fails too. > > > > Ah, sure. It fails too (both test_suspend=mem and regular suspend/resume). > > Having looked at the commit the Arek's bisect turned up I don't > think it's likely to have caused this problem to appear. > > It seems that the regression had been introduced before the PM and > PCI updates went it, so I bet it's one of the x86 changes. Ingo, > are there any commits obviously worth testing? i lost context - a list/range of commits to check would be nice. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/