Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763003AbZDCBb7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:31:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754035AbZDCBbu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:31:50 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:41821 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbZDCBbt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:31:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 03:31:46 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Al Viro Cc: Dave Hansen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] fs: mnt_want_write speedup Message-ID: <20090403013146.GB23937@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090310143718.GB15977@wotan.suse.de> <1236809477.30142.83.camel@nimitz> <20090312041334.GB1893@wotan.suse.de> <1237403623.8286.196.camel@nimitz> <20090402182210.GB17175@wotan.suse.de> <20090402184305.GI28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090402184305.GI28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1492 Lines: 30 On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:43:05PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:22:10PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:13:43PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 05:13 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > > > I'm feeling a bit better about these, although I am still honestly quite > > > > > afraid of the barriers. I also didn't like all the #ifdefs much, but > > > > > here's some help on that. > > > > > > > > FWIW, we have this in suse kernels because page fault performance was > > > > so bad compared with SLES10. mnt_want_write & co was I think the 2nd > > > > biggest offender for file backed mappings (after pvops). I think we're > > > > around parity again even with pvops. > > > > > > Page faults themselves? Which path was that from? > > > > Yes. file_update_time. > > FWIW, I'm not sure that this optimization is valid. We might eventually > want to go for "don't allow any new writers, remount r/o when existing > ones expire" functionality, so nested mnt_want_write() might eventually > be allowed to fail. I guess then it would need another flag to check than checking RDONLY (BECOMING_RDONLY or something) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/